The Daniel Morgan panel report will be the nearest we ever get to Leveson Part II

23rd May 2021

We have a lopsided view of the bad things that were happening in respect of the media around the turn of this century.

The focus has been on the press – journalistic ethics, newsroom culture and the breaches of the civil and criminal law.

But those did not happen in a vacuum.

What elements of the press did was part of a wider problem, which involved the metropolitan police and the private investigation industry.

Of course, the press took advantage of these relations and was the source of a lot of the money involved.

But there were wrongs being committed on the supply-side of the trade in personal information.

Had the Leveson inquiry continued with its phase two – that was to look at the dealings of the press with the police and so on – then we would now have a more rounded picture of what went on.

But the Leveson inquiry will now never continue to phase two.

And so the nearest we will get to a documented understanding of this supply-side will be the independent panel report on the Daniel Morgan case – a case which goes to the heart of the problematic relationship between the press, the police and the private investigation industry.

It may well turn out to be the best record we will ever get of what then happened – and how so many got away with so many things which they should not have done so.

 

2 thoughts on “The Daniel Morgan panel report will be the nearest we ever get to Leveson Part II”

  1. So true. But there is also the ability of the ‘establishment’ to close ranks to protect itself, as we saw so clearly after the calamity at Hillsborough. Justice is neither done, nor seen to be done, for an extraordinarily long time and in the meantime history repeats itself and no one is held to proper account.

  2. You say this report “ may well turn out to be the best record we will ever get of what then happened” but your comment assumes the report is ever allowed to enter the public domain! Whatever the motives behind the delay in publication of the report, one has to suspect there is more to this than the Home Office claims. I, for one, am disappointed that when the Home Secretary was interviewed on the Sunday morning political shows yesterday this issue was ignored. The Home Office should not and cannot be allowed to mark its own homework.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.