New Substack Essay: The 1610 case of Dr Bonham, and the question of whether parliament is really sovereign

 

22nd January 2023

The new essay at my Substack is up.

The essay is on the 1610 case of Dr Bonham, and the question of whether parliament is really sovereign:

These essays on legal history or law/lore are for paid subscribers, and they are additional to my weekday free-to-read topical commentary here on the law and policy blog.

Previous essays in this series are:

Malone (1979) – perhaps the most significant constitutional case of the last 50 years

Wednesbury (1948) – the origin of the modern principle of legal unreasonableness

*

These essays are cross-posted on Patreon for my Patreon supporters.

Anyone who made a Paypal donation to this blog in 2022, as well as Patreon supporters, can be given a one-year free complimentary subscription – just leave a message marked “PRIVATE” below.

It is important that nobody pays ‘twice’ for my content.

****

Comments Policy

This blog enjoys a high standard of comments, many of which are better and more interesting than the posts.

Comments are welcome, but they are pre-moderated and comments will not be published if irksome, or if they risk derailing the discussion.

One thought on “New Substack Essay: The 1610 case of Dr Bonham, and the question of whether parliament is really sovereign”

  1. 1610 was of course before 1707 and the Union of the Parliaments.
    Whether the question of the Sovereignty of Parliament was the situation in England is a moot point, certainly it was never the situation in Scotland.
    This is still a live issue as the whole question of the nature of the Union is being discussed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.