The urban legend of the boiled frog, Loki’s branching timelines, and public policy after Brexit

29th July 2021

I am still putting together my detailed piece on the Lugano Convention issue.

This is about how the European Commission has effectively vetoed the United Kingdom’s late (and panicked) application for participation in an arrangement for enforcing judgments in European Union and EFTA member states.

The piece looks at the causes of the current predicament – but also at the consequences.

The ‘so what?’ of any law and policy situation.

And sometimes the ‘so what?’ is not urgent and immediate – it is not eye-catching and headline-prompting and retweet-generating.

But it is serious all along.

And one only notices when it is too late.

*

Here the usual analogy is with the poor boiling frogs of urban folklore.

In reality, of course, the frogs, like other animals, would escape if they can when in ever-hotter water.

But a good analogy will never die, even if immersed in boiling water.

*

Another analogy – which is currently uppermost in the minds of fantasy and comics geeks (like me) – is that of branching timelines.

In Loki – a wonderful piece of television – the conceit is that there is an omnipotent and omniscient bureaucratic authority that monitors and regulates the timelines of the universe(s).

From time to time (pun intended), a thing happens on a timeline of a universe that means that there are stark deviations to that timeline.

And when those deviations in turn mean that there are significant new branches of reality, the bureaucrats-in-uniform intervene to correct the timeline.

*

Brexit is a new branching timeline in the history of the public policy of the United Kingdom.

Our public policy is now diverging from European Union public policy – slightly at first, and only becoming obvious over time.

But over that time, there will be many multiplying differences and discrepancies.

Those gaps will become wider and deeper.

But we are not in Loki.

There may not be some big-bang ‘nexus’ event to alert everyone to the huge gaps that will soon exist.

And we also do not have a time variance authority to step in to return us to the ‘sacred’ timeline from which we have departed.

We do not have the fantasy of some omnipotent and omniscient authority (and still less an omnibenevolent one).

*

This lack of a big-bang ‘nexus’ event is something, perhaps, that those campaigning for the United Kingdom to (re)join the European Union will not have as an advantage.

There may be no one spectacular sudden public policy failure to to which they can point.

Just a thousand inconveniences and misadventures, which will be endured and resented, but that will not mobilise and motivate a political movement.

We will be stuck with it.

We will be like a frog, but not one able to jump from boiling water

Instead, we will be a frog trapped in a bottle of our own making

**

Thank you for reading.

Please support this liberal and constitutionalist blog – and please do not assume it can keep going without your support.

If you value this daily, free-to-read and independent legal and policy commentary for you and others please do support through the Paypal box above, or become a Patreon subscriber.

***

You can subscribe for each post to be sent by email at the subscription box above (on an internet browser) or on a pulldown list (on mobile).

****

Comments Policy

This blog enjoys a high standard of comments, many of which are better and more interesting than the posts.

Comments are welcome, but they are pre-moderated.

Comments will not be published if irksome.

6 thoughts on “The urban legend of the boiled frog, Loki’s branching timelines, and public policy after Brexit”

  1. “There may be no one spectacular sudden public policy failure to to which they can point.” – What about if Scottish independence comes about as an inevitable outcome of Brexit? That would represent, from the point of view of the Conservative Party, a most spectacular (if not sudden) policy failure.

  2. I wonder if there won’t be a lot of pressure from business *not* to diverge? Businesses with supply lines or markets in the EU (which must mean an awfully large proportion of medium sizes and larger outfits) will surely want close regulatory alignment and mutually-enforceable rules and agreements.

    I think that if businesses don’t get this, the punters *will* eventually notice. Empty supermarket shelves are… empty, for instance. Plus e.g. lack of building materials stalling building jobs, inability to buy the white goods you want because the superstore has no/limited stock etc etc.,, I think stuff like that is actually dangerous for a Brexit government, because it all has the same straightforward explanation.

    And… it isn’t like the old Eastern Europe, where lots of people don’t miss what they never had (although obviously eventually they did start to miss it). Here we have things people now take for granted (well stocked supermarket shelves) gradually being compromised. And all thanks to the people who said they’d “Get Brexit Done!”.

    1. be reassured the UK GOV with a little help from the press will find the one who’s fault it is.
      BSE
      Blame somebody else

  3. I found the recent adoption by the Commission of adequacy decisions with respect to UK data protection laws interesting.
    I wonder to what extent such decisions will discourage ‘branching’, and how widely they will be applied in other areas.

  4. I may have pointed out before that commercial contracts with arbitration clauses do not rely on the Lugano Convention for enforcement. Arbitral Awards are enforceable through the New York Convention 1968 to which the UK and almost all other trading states are signatories. That is not affected by ‘Brexit’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.